Just another WordPress.com site

Posts tagged ‘child molesters’

Florida school district hates the Boy Scouts. And so do we!

The never-ending war against the Boy Scouts of America continues in Pinellas County Florida. The local school board has voted to cut funds to a Scout-affiliated program called Learning for Life due to its policy of excluding agnostics, atheists, and members of the LGBTQXYZ community. The organization will now miss out on a grant worth $54,000.

The organization’s mission statement is as follows:

“To develop and deliver engaging, research based academic, character, leadership and career focused programs aligned to state and national standards that guide and enable all students to achieve their full potential.”

Yeah, and to teach the little tykes to be judging, judgmental homophobes!

I say good riddance to the Boy Scouts. Get lost and don’t come back. We’ve had enough of your “values”, your helping little old ladies across the street and such. We’re on to you. We know that when you say “values” you really mean driving homosexuals to kill themselves!

The Boy Scouts of America--Ku Klux Klan in neckerchiefs.

Seriously though, if I threatened to kill myself do you think the government would force them to allow me to join? Because I would really be interested in taking some young boys camping. Threatening to kill myself usually works, but this time it might not. You see, back in 2000, there was this supreme court decision called Dale v. Boy Scouts that actually said that private organizations can maintain their own membership requirements because they are private! Can you believe that? I thought “private” meant that the government decided their membership requirements. That’s what private means to me. And because I’m so used to the government forcing people to accept my behavior, I was shocked–shocked!–to find out that this private organization had the right to free association.

Since the Dale decision, we homosexuals have teamed up with the godless community (and there’s a A LOT of overlapping there) to engage in a war of attrition against the BSA. We failed in our attempt to force them to accept us as members, so now we’re going to have harass them on every front, push them out of their long held meeting places, and cut their funding until they cry uncle and let homosexuals like me take their sons out on camping trips.

So what is their rationale for excluding sodomites? Apparently we’re “unclean”.

“Boy Scouts of America believes that homosexual conduct is inconsistent with the obligations in the Scout Oath and Scout Law to be morally straight and clean in thought, word, and deed.”

Huh? So their lame ass excuse for keeping us out is that we’re “icky”! Nothing icky about two men buttfucking. And as far as morally straight, well…I don’t have a straight bone in  my body.

But seriously, what’s unclean about sodomy? Let’s ask radical gay bully and all around pervert Dan Savage. He knows. He coined the term “Santorum”, defined as:

Feces, jizz, and KY jelly. What’s unclean about that?

Just to underscore the point that sodomy is definitely NOT an unclean practice, let’s refer to that taxpayer funded youth-oriented pamphlet that I distribute out of my office at the high school. Let’s see, besides fuckin’, suckin’, piss play, and “lickin’ butt”, there’s also a section on toys.

“There is some risk of hepatitis, herpes, warts, and parasites.”

PARASITES? So I could get little critters crawling around among my dingleberries? Geez, that does sound a little gross. But it’s definitely not unclean as the bigoted Boy Scouts will tell you.

Oh yes, and the pamphlet also warns that the risk of intestinal parasites is very high when “rimming” (lickin’ butt). But all of that can be avoided if we just teach the little tenderfeet to do all of these things safely! Rather than discouraging such behaviors, scoutmasters should be offering instruction on how to properly clean toys between one boy’s anus and the other. That way they would be able to do it safely and it wouldn’t be at all unclean.

But no! These uptight prudes think the best solution is simply to teach their sons not to do these things. Which is just dumb. I want to get into this club so I can teach them my way of doing things.

Luckily, we have the Democratic Party in our corner on this one. They hate the Boy Scouts just as much as we do. Who can forget when delegates at the 2000 DNC National Convention in Los Angeles actually booed the Boy Scouts while they were presenting the colors?

That was truly the highlight of the convention, even better than watching Al and Tipper make out. Now, at first I was a little confused. As I was watching the whole thing unfold, I thought to myself, “Are they booing the Christofascist scouts or are they booing the colors?” I’d be in favor of booing both, actually. But then I watched as the delegates quickly drew up makeshift signs that read “we support gay scouts”, and my heart swelled with pride. So they were booing the children. That was very sweet of them.

Interesting side note: the little scouts actually got their revenge on the Democrats. At the 2010 National Jamboree, the scouts booed President Obama. Ouch! I guess they can boo back. If I had been president, I would have called in drones on the whole encampment of little terrorists. Too bad he didn’t.

The Boy Scouts of America, a dangerous hate group. They're not yet on the SPLC's list of hate groups, though I trust they will be soon. Somebody's got to stop them.

I recently learned of the existence of a wonderful group called “Scouting for All” that works to pressure the BSA to repeal its ban on pole-smokers and the godless. Scouting for All holds “tolerance” and “diversity” as its highest ideals. Just in case you were wondering if those two words are codewords for homos infiltrating kiddie organizations, now you know that they are.

I hold the highest respect for one of Scouting for All’s leaders, a certain defrocked priest named John Hemstreet. He’s a gay man, a convicted child molester, an alcoholic, and the president of his local chapters of Scouting for All and PFLAG.

Wait–did I say that he’s a gay man and a child molester? That’s not possible. Because child molesters are not really attracted to their victims, they just rape them for the sense of power it provides. That’s the pat answer I’ve been given anyway. Child molesters are not gays and gays are not child molesters. The definition of one precludes the other. Because if you consider the fact that nearly all of the child predatory aspects of scouting are male-on-male, you’d have to assume that these people are in fact homosexuals, or at least bisexuals. But no, I prefer to believe that men who rape little boys don’t have a homosexual bone in their bodies. In fact, they don’t even get off on it. Again, as I mentioned before, there is no sexual attraction  involved. It’s merely a sense of power. Kind of odd though how child molesters seem to have a preference for one sex or the other. Even odder that a convicted child molester would be the president of his local chapter of an influential gay rights group (PFLAG).

As I mentioned before, John Hemstreet was a Catholic priest but then he got caught boinking the altar boys and he had to leave the priesthood. Normally, I would get all upset about that. I don’t really hate child molesting Catholic priests because they’re child molesters. I hate them because they’re Catholic priests. But this particular child molesting Catholic priest redeemed himself by leaving that awful church and spearheading two gay rights groups in his area. Which is kind of odd, considering the fact that he’s not gay, he’s a child molester. And it’s literally impossible for a person to be both. Weird.

Scouting for All knot. It interweaves the purple and white of the international scouting movement with the rainbow colors of the pro-sodomy movement.

Hemstreet led a protest outside the offices of the BSA’s Erie Shores Council in May of 2000. He says that he’s great scoutmaster material and the BSA should quit being H8-ful H8ers and just let him be a scoutmaster again, despite the fact that he’s already been to jail for raping little boys.

And really, why should that exclude him from being a scout leader? Hemstreet explains:

“The thing that I did seven years ago is a horrendous thing. I’m not denying that. Nor am I denying that I did it. I was arrested. I was arraigned. I did go to court. I served my time and I am off on probation.”

Furthermore, it wasn’t even scouts that Hemstreet was convicted of raping. It was altar boys. Big difference.

“The crime that I committed was committed after I, kind of, retired from the active priesthood. It was not related to scouting at all–I was drunker than a skunk.”

See? So it was the booze, not his pervy desires that drove him to bang children. And besides, the boys weren’t even associated with the scouts. It was completely compartmentalized. Even though he might force a child to pleasure him in the sacristy after mass, he would never–and I mean NEVER–force a child to pleasure him in his tent on a camporee.

“At the time I was mainly in denial, and I certainly wasn’t coming out.”

Wait, wait, wait. Did he say “coming out”? You mean like coming out as a homosexual? Damn it, will someone tell this guy to get back on script? He’s NOT GAY! He’s a child molester. And child molesters are not gay. He’s not really attracted to the male of the species, he just likes the feeling of power he gets when dominating boys. Because if we had to admit that men who molest boys are in fact homosexual–a fact that appears glaringly obvious to anyone who hasn’t been inundated with homosexual propaganda–we might have to admit that homosexual men are responsible for an alarmingly disproportionate amount of child molesting.

Hemstreet explained that his interest in scouting flows from an honest desire to “give back” to the community. He has hurt little boys in the past so now he wants to join the Boy Scouts to do some penance. I don’t know why anyone wouldn’t believe an explanation like that coming out of the mouth of a convicted child molester. I believe him. Sure, he’s raped little boys before–not boy scouts, but other types of little boys. Sure he did time in prison. But now he’s out and he wants to repay his debt to society by…taking little boys camping! Nothing suspicious about that. He just likes kids and wants to do something to help them.

Sadly, the Scouts continue their evil discrimination. It takes a better organization full of kind and accepting people to extend membership to a guy like Hemstreet. Two organizations I can think of–Scouting for All and PFLAG– seem to have no problem whatsoever with allowing Hemstreet as a member. Heck, they have no problem with allowing him to serve in a leadership role. Now that’s what I call tolerance. The Boy Scouts could learn a thing or two from these two fine organizations.

These pedophiles are stealing our schtick. Good for them.

These pedophiles are stealing our schtick. As you may have heard, the push is on to get pedophilia removed the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

This should recall shades of the 70’s era gay rights movement when teaming hordes of pissy homosexuals crashed APA conferences and demanded that their sexuality be legitimized. They pioneered the tactic of threatening and shouting down anyone who opposed them. It took a few years of bullying psychiatrists but they eventually relented and removed same-sex attraction disorder (SSAD) from the DSM. Thank goodness.

These days, we’ve got the APA stuffed to the gills with LGBTQXYZ advocates who masquerade as non-partisan professionals. Many of them are homosexuals themselves! And as we know, homosexuals have no ax to grind in the homosexuality debate. Their research is in no way tainted by the fact that they are, themselves, practitioners of the same sexual proclivities that they’re studying with a dispassionate and unbiased eye. The APA even endorsed marriage equality…unanimously!

If these pedophiles are smart, they’ll do the same thing. When you stack the field  with people who already agree with you, “the experts” will always be on your side. They will write papers, publish books, and conduct experiments that all come to your predetermined conclusions! 

It appears that the child molesting community has since discovered that they may need to take a similar course of action if they’re ever going to remove the stigma associated with raping little children. Once the psychiatric community decides that your behavior no longer constitutes a mental disorder, the flood gates are open! Not that I support that. I mean, child molesters are bad. And stuff.

B4U-ACT, a Maryland-based organization of psychiatric practitioners, recently sponsored a conference that addressed the issue of how to destigmatize pedophilia. The conference was attended by Christofascist loser Matt Barber of the fringe right-wing Liberty Counsel Action. Any group that would take offense at a pedophilia conference is obviously a hate group. I checked the Southern Poverty Law Center website to see if these people have yet been identified as a hate group, and I they aren’t. But they should be.

Right-wing bigot Matt Barber says that he felt he was “on another planet”. Speakers at the conference openly endorsed the removal of pedophilia from the DSM. Said Barber:

“The entire focus of the event was on the victimhood of the pedophile.”

Well, yeah. I’ve heard that all of the hate that society heaps on child molesters really makes them feel bad. Somebody has to stand up for them. Leave it up to Barber to malign this group for the crime of compassion. Only a real douchebag would fault these caring professionals for trying to remove the stigma associated with pedophilia. I say we charge Barber with murder if any child molesters end up killing themselves because of the shame bigots thrust upon them.

I wanted to find out more about this group so I sought out their website. Yes, they have one: http://b4uact.org/

Even though homosexuality and pedophilia bear no relation to each other–and the societal acceptance of the former will have no effect on the societal acceptance of the latter–the organization seems to be using the gay rights movement as a precedent. Odd. Dr. Fred Berlin, as quoted on their website:

“Just as has been the case historically with homosexuality, society is currently addressing the matter of pedophilia with a balance that is far more heavily weighted on the side of criminal justice solutions than on the side of mental health solutions.”

Just has been the case with homosexuality? Whoa! There’s no comparison there. It’s almost as if homosexuality is paving the way for all sorts of other perversions to become normalized, something that I insisted would never happen. Well, I can forgive Dr. Berlin in this instance because I know that he’s not a Christofascist who would try to use the linkage as a weapon against us.  

B4U-ACT appeals to the child molesters directly:

“You may be looking for mental health services to deal with anxiety, depression, anger, or other factors either unrelated to your sexuality or resulting from society’s stereotypes and reactions to your sexual feelings.”

Yes, society has a lot of stereotypes about child molesters. Like that they’re sick, for example. And once we remove pedophilia as a sickness from the DSM, it just won’t be a sickness anymore. Anyone who still claims that it’s a sickness will be a science-hater. And you don’t want to be a science-hater…do you? Psychiatrists who still diagnose and treat pedophilia as a sickeness will have their licenses revoked. In other words, we’ll just do to them what we’ve done to people who still believe that homosexuality is a mental disorder. It worked like gangbusters for us, so why not?

I’m sure that child molesters also deal with a lot of depression and anger as a result of society’s deep-rooted prejudices. As a victim of such prejudices myself, I can attest to the pain of not being validated. That’s what I desire more than anything else. I need people to tell me over and over again that my sexual behavior is healthy, normal, and beautiful.

The idea that someone, somewhere, is harboring the slightest disapproval of what I do is enough to make me want to kill myself. That’s why we need to police the beliefs of others and punish free speech–so that fragile people like me won’t off themselves. I threaten to kill myself at the drop of a hat. Just this morning I had to call the suicide hotline after I got out of bed and saw that the sky was cloudy. Every time I don’t get my way I tell my opponent that he’s murdering gay people with his mean attitudes.

Does anyone know the suicide rate for child molesters? It must be astronomically high. There’s only one way to lower that statistic and that’s a full-court press propaganda campaign to push pedophilia into the mainstream. It has to be everywhere, at all times, loud, and in your face.

The appeal to child molesters continues: 

“Or you may be wondering how to live life fully and stay within the law.”

See? So they want to help child piddlers stay within the law. We certainly wouldn’t want them to get in trouble. That’s the concern, not the safety of children, and certainly not the immorality of having sex with minors.

And when you think about it, laws can be changed. When the National Coalition of Gay Organizations laid out its platform at its 1972 convention, they specifically demanded the “Repeal of all laws governing the age of consent.” Looking back on the historic document, I can see that they’ve achieved almost everything on their to-do list. Only a few items–such as the abolition of age of consent laws–still remain to be done.

http://www.robertslevinson.com/gaylesissues/features/collect/onetime/bl_platform1972.htm

In Britain, the rainbow brigades have succeeded in lowering the age of consent for homosexual relations from twenty-one to eighteen, then again from eighteen to sixteen. Peter Tatchell of Britain’s OutRage! group is now pressing for fourteen as the age of consent for both homosexual and heterosexual relations. And who knows if they’ll be finished then? Eleven sounds pretty good. How about eight?

Peter Tatchell of Britain's OutRage! He's a giant in the British wing of the gay rights movement. He wants the age of consent to be lowered to fourteen. Tatchell argues that lowering the age of consent will reduce the incidence of child sexual abuse. So legalizing child sexual abuse is the best way to root it out. Makes sense to me.

Incrimentalism is a wonderful thing. Society would never swallow the whole turd if we force-fed it to them in one bite, so let’s spoon it to them one morsel at a time.

As you can see, “staying within the law” is kind of moving target. All we have to do is change the law and it becomes much easier for these people to “live life fully” while staying within it.

Let’s get on it!

This just in: As I’ve read further about this organization, it’s come to my attention that the operations director of B4U-ACT, Richard Kramer, is a self-described “boy lover”. He has written a wonderful letter to the editor of a pro-pedophilia organization, yearning for the good old days of the 1970’s when there wasn’t such an unthinking kneejerk reaction to men having sex with boys. He uses the word “we” when speaking of BL’s (boy lovers) and GL’s (girl lovers).

“The fundamental issue we need to address is the defense of our humanity. We need to confront the stigmatization, demonization, and stereotyping that exists due simply to our attraction to children or adolescents, regardless of our behavior. To do this, we need to be honest about our sexuality.”

I am not surprised. Not in the least. If there’s one thing that Kramer learned well from the example gays have bequethed him, it’s that opposition to your agenda can best be combatted by infiltrating the opposing camp and neutralizing them from the inside. That’s how we dealt with  the APA when they called our sexuality a pathology, and now he’s trying it as well. With any luck, he’ll soon be infilitrating the schools and churches.

Mr. Kramer can be reached here:  (443) 547-4061  DIRECTOR@b4uact.org

Ireland’s great gay hope tripped up by petty concerns about pedophilia.

In the pantheon of gay heroes, David Norris ranks among the greatest. His long legal battle with the Republic of Ireland led to the repeal of its anti-homosexuality laws in 1993. His career in the Seanad (Irish Senate) has been characterized by his passion for civil rights (for homosexuals, not for anyone else). And until just recently, he was the odds on favorite to be the next President of Ireland. If he had achieved that feat, he would have been the first openly gay president in the history of Ireland; and Europe for that matter. His candidacy had strong support across Ireland, particularly among Irish youth. His following generated comparisons between Norris and Obama circa 2008. He was, in short, a rock star.

David Norris at pro-baby killing rally. You go, girl!

Electing an openly gay president would have signaled Ireland’s complete break with the medieval institution so long associated with it–the Catholic Church. The once socially conservative country has moved left in a big way, having legalized divorce, homosexual relations, and even gay civil unions. Abortion and gay marriage seem like the next logical steps.

Faith in the church has largely declined because Irish priests are a bunch of icky child molesters. Which wouldn’t normally bother me, except for the fact that the child molesters involved are Catholic priests. I don’t hate child molesting Catholic priests because they’re child molesters. I hate them because they are Catholic priests. And David Norris basically agrees with me.

Mr. Norris abandoned the campaign for the Irish presidency last week after a trumped up pedophilia scare brought the pressure to bear on him. Which is so stupid, because when I look for a president, I don’t ask myself what his personal feelings are on adults having sex with children. That’s of no consequence to me. I want competency. And I also want to advance the homosexual agenda while simultaneously bankrupting the nation, which is why I voted for Barack Obama. And if I were Irish, I’d be voting for Norris.

The statesman weathered a previous “scandal” in May when a tawdry restaurant critic–Helen Lucy Burke–dug up an old interview she’d done with Norris from 2002. In it, Norris mentions his support for pedophilia.

“In terms of classic paedophilia, as practised by the Greeks for example, where it is an older man introducing a younger man or boy to adult life, I think there can be something to be said for it.”

What’s controversial about that? One of my favorite tactics to use when trying to justify the morality of homosexuality is to point out that it has always existed. And that means that it’s okay. Just like pedophilia has always existed. Homosexuality was rampant in all sorts of pre-Christian societies like Rome and Greece. And that means that it’s okay. Just like pedophilia. The samurai of feudal Japan were raging homosexuals and no one thought anything was wrong with it. They were usually raping the boy apprentices placed in their charge, and no one thought anything was wrong with that either. To tell the truth, I can’t think of a single society that has tolerated homosexuality that didn’t also tolerate all sorts of other perversions. Those societies are clearly more enlightened than this one, which drips of Chrisotfascist moralisms.

Scenes like this have been found in archeological digs from all over the Hellenic world. Homosexuality was common in the ancient world. Powerful friendships blossomed between men and boys. It wasn't until the Christianization of these areas that such practices were suppressed. David Norris sees nothing wrong with it and I don't think we can fault him for that. He's clearly the victim of a homophobic witch-hunt.

Basically, everywhere you look in the non-Christian world, homosexuality has flourished. Well, except for the Muslim world, where they kill fags like me. But then along came these religious zealots with their moral hangups about sex and everything changed. All of a sudden it wasn’t permitted anymore for guys to take it in the poopchute or to have huge orgies with eleven year old boys or to fuck the samurai trainees. It’s a good thing we’re rapidly progressing toward the post-Christian world when these taboos on things like homosexuality and pedophilia will fade away again.   

The senator continued:

“Now again, this is not something that appeals to me, although when I was younger it would most certainly have appealed to me in the sense that  I would have greatly relished the prospect of an older, attractive, mature man taking me under his wing, lovingly introducing me to sexual realities, and treating me with affection and teaching me about life – yes, I think that would be lovely; I would have enjoyed that.”

Yeah, me too.

Norris called the reemergence of a nine year old interview “sabotage”, which it clearly was. No fair bringing up stuff like that, especially in an election year. Norris fired back:

“This is an attempt to sabotage my campaign. It’s a 10-year-old article. There is nothing new and I want to ask why is this being brought up now… I abhor, and I’ve made that clear, again and again on the record, I abhor the abuse of children, sexual, emotional or physical”

Yeah, so there! It’s old news. Everyone knew that Norris thinks it’s okay for adults to bang boys. Everyone knew, and nobody cared. Certainly not the people of Ireland who continued to name Norris as their top pick in poll after poll, even after the restaurant critic attempted to sabotage him.

The dapper senator has always been quite liberal in his views. Cosmopolitan, you might say. He thinks, for example, that Ireland’s age of consent law is much too high. Well, not that it’s too high, but that it shouldn’t exist at all. That’s right, these silly laws are really just as backwards as all the others that came before it–the ones against sodomy and killing children in the womb and stuff like that. David Norris remarked to Jason O’Toole of the Irish Daily Mail that he doesn’t believe there should be any laws regarding the age of consent for sexual activity.

Oooh…so “controversial”. If you’re a complete square, that is.

Now, he DOES abhor the abuse of children. He’s been on record about that. He took the church to task for its sex scandals in the Seanad’s Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse. Read it here:

http://www.senatordavidnorris.ie/blogger/2009/05/statements-on-commission-to-inquire.html

That’s right, this perv was on the Commission to Inquire Into Child Abuse! But, like me, he only hates pedophiles when they belong to the homophobic church in Rome. Because they’re HYPOCRITES. Not like David Norris.

Ireland’s leading LGBTQXYZ crusader loathes child sexual abuse so much that he even dated a child sex abuser for about thirty years. In fact, his love an adoration for this man was eventually what brought down his campaign. Norris was once romantically linked with an Israeli peace activist named Ezra Yitzhak Nawi.

Ezra Yitzhak Nawi, former partner of David Norris. He's a lifelong peace activist and supporter of Palestinian rights. Which is kind of strange because he likes to sleep with Palestinian men who take up arms against Israel. Odd that a peace activist would do that. I bet he's a member of QUIT!--see link at right side. Anyway, Mr. Nawi was convicted of statutory rape of a fifteen year old Palestinian boy. Which could have happened to anybody.

Mr. Nawi bedded a fifteen year old Palestinian boy in 1992. He was later convicted of statutory rape for the offense in 1997. Senator David Norris then sent a letter, on his official Irish parliamentary letterhead, to the High Court in Jerusalem begging for clemency. Norris presented himself as a character witness on Nawi’s behalf. He’s the Irish Bawney Fwank! (See This Day in LGBTQXYZ History: July 20th)

The senator really went to bat for his butt buddy:

“I know him to be an intelligent, honest, trustworthy, good and moral person for whom the present difficulty is quite uncharacteristic.”

See? So this is totally uncharacteristic. He’s only done it like two or three times before. Usually he only sleeps with men who are at least sixteen…usually. He’s also a very moral person. He’s the most moral statutory rapist there’s ever been. Norris even went as far as to say that Nawi is “a very good son to his mother”! Yeah, Nawi really makes his old Jewish mother proud when he piddles Palestinian boys. He’s a real Mensch, eh?

Senator Norris rounded out his chutzpah by arguing that his ex-boyfriend was the true victim here, having been “lured into a carefully prepared trap.” No doubt by the Joos! But Nawi pled guilty nonetheless, just so a trial would be averted and the Palestinian boy would be spared the pain of having to give testimony. So he pled guilty for the boy’s sake, and not because he did anything wrong. Norris also wrote that he was writing his letter “out of love and concern” for his former lover.

I do not regret supporting and seeking clemency for a friend, but I do regret giving the impression that I did not have sufficient compassion for the victim of Ezra’s crime.

Um…what crime, David? Ezra’s the victim here, remember? 

Well, we all know that Norris has compassion for the “victim”. That’s why he thinks that age of consent laws should be abolished. And that there’s something to be said for “classical pedophilia” in the Greek tradition. And why he talks dreamily about how wonderful it would have been if an older man had stuck his dick in his rectum when he was a child.

That letter brought down the presidential campaign of a gay giant, and along with it the hope of a new, post-Catholic generation of young Irishmen and -women. Ireland is the poorer for it.  The nation will just have to wait a little longer for its first gay president. Hopefully the next one won’t like the lads as much as this one does.

As David Norris remarked:

“I have lived a decent, respectable life, and there has been no scandal.”

So true, David. So true.

Kiddie porn ring busted. GLAD they’ll have good lawyers.

Attorney General Eric Holder announced earlier this week the conclusion of Operation Delgado–the take-down of a  multinational, internet-based kiddie porn ring operating from servers in the US. The website, entitled “Dreamboard” was a virtual nightmare of abusive sexual exploitation. It had around six hundred members, all men, from various countries across the globe, including the US, Canada, Kenya, France, and Ecuador.

"We got 'em!" Holder fist-pumps the sting operation that brought down an international child pornography ring. Just kidding. This is a picture from his black power days. Well, that would imply that his black power days are located somewhere in the past, which clearly they aren't. He still hates whitey. Okay, so this is a picture from his ridiculous necklace days.

Kind of wish I’d known about Dreamboard before they took it down. Oops…did I say that out loud?

Attorney General Holder laid out of some of the more sordid details:

“In order to become part of the Dreamboard community, prospective members were required to upload pornography portraying children under 12 years of age or younger.”

“Under 12 years of age or younger”. Well said, Eric. I’m guessing you got into Columbia on the affirmative action program. Just a guess.

Apparently, there was some really sick shit on there.

“Some of the children featured in these images and videos were just infants and in many cases, the children being victimized were in obvious and also intentional pain, even in distress and crying, just as the rules for one area of the bulletin board mandated. They had to be in distress and crying.”

As I watched the story unfold on CNN, I found myself asking–is GLAD going to come to the men’s defense or what? Seriously, they’re going to need a good legal team with experience getting pedophiles off the hook.

When I speak of GLAD, I’m referring of course to Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, the Boston-based legal group that was formed for in 1978 for the specific purpose of defending adult men who had sex parties with teenage boys. (Not to be confused with GLAAD–Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation). The organization really should have called themselves PAD (Pedophile Advocates & Defenders), but that didn’t have quite the same ring to it. It was better for PR purposes to portray themselves as an organization dedicated to defending gay men. Which, I suppose they were. Gay men who organized drug-fueled sex parties with kids from the local junior high.

Equal Justice Under Law...except for victims of pedophiles.

It was the seventies…what can I say? Things were really taking off for the LGBTQXYZ community. It was nearly ten years after Stonewall and we were starting to see cracks in America’s anti-gay exterior. There were enclaves here and there–San Fransicko, Manhattan, Boston–where it was almost acceptable to be out and proud. Harvey Milk had just been elected America’s first openly gay politician and AIDS was yet to put a damper on our hyperactive sex lives.

Sexual emancipation was the buzz word of the day. Sure, pedophilia seemed like traversing some kind of boundary. But that’s what we were about! Traversing the sexual boundaries that had choked us for centuries. If there was anything we stood for, it was the destruction of sexual mores that mandated sex occur only between husband and wife, and then only in the missionary position, and only for the purposes of procreation. Adults having sex with children was a new frontier, but then again so was men having sex with men, and women having sex with women.  They called boy lovers “perverts”, but  they called us queerboys “perverts” too. Who were we to judge?

And then disaster struck. In June of 1977, police raided a home in Revere, Massachusetts, arresting its owner and eventually twenty-four other men. It appears that the house on Mountain Avenue was the hub of some kind of pornographic sex ring where adult men threw beer bashes for underage boys. The objective was, of course, to get the teenage boys drunk and high, then to sodomize them.

How come nobody told me about these parties? You guys are really letting me down.

The twenty-four men indicted were charged with raping boys ranging in age from eight to thirteen, which was such an exaggeration because it later turned out that they could only prove that the men were having sex with boy hustlers who were at least fifteen years old. Okay, and one of them was nine. And most of them liked it. So it’s all cool.

The men took a plea bargain deal and got off with fines and probation. Great work on the part of their lawyers.

Boston Magazine has a great story on the Revere sex ring, the Boston area pedophile/gay rights scene, and the two major organizations that arose from the flap–GLAD and the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). Read all about it:

http://www.bostonmagazine.com/articles/boy_crazy/

Enter the villain of this affair. No, not the ring of pervy sexual predetors with the sex dungeon in Revere. I’m talking about the District Attorney of Suffolk County, Garrett Byrne. DA Byrne surmised that there might be other such pedophilia houses in the county, which isn’t such a wild assumption considering the fact that the Boston public library and Revere Beach were pretty much the hottest spots for anonymous liaisons between men and sometimes boys.  Believe me, no one was checking ID’s. I certainly wasn’t, and I was there.

Mr. Byrne’s witchhunt began with a simple hotline. Anonymous tipsters could call in and report on anyone they thought was sexually abusing children. THE HORROR! Anonymous sex? Yes. Anonymous tip lines that notify law enforcement about possible sexual predators? That’s downright un-American!

I mean, someone could just dime out a person they didn’t like. Kind of the same way they could dime out a person they didn’t like for any crime just by calling the police station. People should not be able to report a crime because they might make a false report. So we musn’t allow reporting. Did you hear me? NO REPORTING!

Clearly, the hotline was unconstitutional. Because we didn’t like it. Anything we don’t like is unconstitutional.

The DA had declared war on Boston’s pedophile community and we homos would be his first casualties. I can’t understand why a gay man would be concerned about a pedophile hotline unless he was in fact a pedophile himself, but…we all know that “pedophile” is a code word. So law enforcement must never make any attempt to smoke the pervs out, because they’re really after adult men who have consensual sex with other adult men. As well as gay men who lure high school freshmen to their homes with pot and beer and then rape them up the ass.

Even though there’s no overlapping between the gay community and the pedophile community, we get a little nervous whenever anyone suggests that something should be done about child molesters. So, just to be safe, let’s not do anything about child molesters unless they happen to be Catholic priests.

The local gay community mounted an intense campaign to shut down the pedophile hotline, by judicial order if necessary. The courts always give us what we want and that’s why we love them. The effort was spearheaded by John Ward, Boston’s first openly gay male attorney and the founder of GLAD. He took the DA to court and the Byrne backed down, agreeing to “voluntarily” terminate the perv hotline.

Gay hero John Ward. He fought valiantly to shut down a hotline where people could tip off law enforcement to the existence of child rapists. Not that gay men do that sort of thing. Child rapists owe him a debt of gratitude. Though it's imposible to put a number on just how many child rapists were spared the shame of getting caught and going to jail, it's certainly a large number. Thanks, John.

That was 1978. Needless to say, most of Boston’s elected officials didn’t want to touch GLAD with a ten foot pole. Since then, the organization has gone completely mainstream. Every politician in the state kisses GLAD’s (diseased) asses. In 2003, they brought the case of two Northampton lesbians to the Massachusetts SJC. Maybe you’ve heard of it–it was called Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, and it brought marriage equality to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Yesterday’s pro-pedophile crusaders are today’s advocates for marriage equality! Who knows what lies ahead for GLAD? Heaven knows we’re never satisfied.

GLAD offers its annual “Spirit of Justice Award” to warriors who toil in the name of total equality for the LGBTQXYZ community. In 2008, that award was presented to…John Ward! It’s kind of cool that you get a lot of awards from an organization when you’re its founder. Anyway, the ceremony really brought a tear to my eye. Mr. Ward was given an introduction befitting his status as a civil rights hero:

The man giving John Ward’s introduction is GLAD legal director Gary Buseck. And as much as I respect Mr. Buseck, I have to correct a few mistakes he made in his introduction. All honest mistakes, I’m sure. Not some kind of attempt to justify a pedophilia ring involving gay men and underage boys.

“…and lo and behold in December of 1977, the DA broke the news of a ‘sex ring’ in nearby Revere, Massachusetts, indicting twenty-four people  on over a hundred felony counts involving older men allegedly having sex with younger men.” 

Well, no. They were accused of having sex with boys. Boys as young as eight. I guess if you consider an eight year old boy a “younger man”, then yes. That was the charge.

The DA called it ‘the tip of the iceberg’ and he set up a hotline asking the public for anonymous tips on homosexuals.

Okay, so that didn’t happen either. Garret Byrne set up a hotline asking for anonymous tips on pedophiles, not homosexuals. But I guess we all need our comforting fictions, our founding legends. So, even if the official GLAD version of what happened is bullshit, that’s fine by me. It’s just one of the many lies that we sodomites tell to advance our agenda. Kind of like Mathew Shepard, the gay gene, AIDS not “discriminating”, one in ten people being gay, and every thing else you hear coming out of our cocksucking mouths.

So let’s hope John Ward comes to the rescue for this generation’s Revere sex ring. The poor guys at Dreamboard need help and who better than GLAD to defend them?

Tag Cloud