Just another WordPress.com site

The fallout continues over Marcus and Michele Bachmann’s wacky, zany, “pray away the gay” therapy clinic. I think you’ll all agree with me that the blowback has been delicious.

So I was watching Real Time with Bill Maher the other night just because I heard that one of his panelists was going to be Dan Savage, my favorite gay sex columnist and an all around sick puppy. Of course, Bill brought up the topic of the Bachmanns and their clinic. It didn’t take more than a few seconds before someone threw out the old “Marcus Bachmann is obviously a repressed homosexual” line, and the fun began. Let’s just say that the banter that followed was hilarious.

Surprisingly, it wasn’t Maher or Savage who really got it started. It was comedian Marc Maron.

“I don’t want to be crass, but I just hope that Marcus Bachmann takes all that, ya know, that rage that comes from repression and denial and brings it into the bedroom with [Michelle]. I hope he fucks her angrily, because that’s how I would. And I’ve thought about it.”

Is that funny or what? Certainly not “crass”. He’s daydreamed about giving it to Michele Bachmann…with malice! Ha Ha! The audience lapped it up, laughing and hooting. Everyone knows that Bill Maher has one of the hippest, savviest, coolest audiences in all of television. I know that I was laughing so hard I nearly spilled my Zima all over myself. I was just whooping and slapping my knees. Ha! Ha! Rape jokes are funny!

Bill Maher and Marc Maron chat about raping a congresswoman. HBO represents the best in television.

Now, I know that may sound like he was admitting to rape fantasies. I mean, it’s hard to imagine a woman consenting to being “fucked angrily”. Consensual hate-fucking seems like a contradiction in terms. Here you go bitch. I’m going to manhandle you. Lay still while pound you. Squeal for me bitch! Squeal for me! And for this guy to have fantasies about it, well…it sounds like he’s got some issues with misogyny that he needs to deal with.

Normally, I would be against that kind of thing. Rape, I mean. Or even just misogynistic fantasies. But this is Michele Bachmann we’re talking about. She’s a right-wing Christian and basically less than human. And so it’s really funny. That’s why the audience roared. No one was laughing harder than me. I’d fuck her angrily myself if it weren’t for the fact that I don’t like women.

It appears that Dan Savage detected the subtle misogyny in Marc Maron’s jokes, so he immediately leapt into action, providing cover for Marc’s comments.

“Just so you don’t get charges of sexism, because only Michele Bachmann was involved. I sometimes think about fucking the shit out of Rick Santorum. Just ’cause I think he needs it. It’s not just women we are talking about fucking. It’s like, ‘let’s bone that Santorum boy.’”
Nice save, Savage! See, so if you balance a disgusting, hateful, violent joke about raping a congresswoman, with another joke in which you joke about “boning that Santorum boy”, it makes everything okay. The “sexism” (or misogyny) of the first joke is negated by the sheer perversion of the second. The fact that they were made by two different people doesn’t matter. Savage’s fantasies of boning Santorum (with malice, I would presume) redeem Maron’s jokes about raping Michele Bachmann. See? No harm, no foul.

Heroic Dan Savage. He wants to sodomize a former US Senator who really "needs it". I love this guy. He says everything I've been thinking but have never had the words to express. Sodomy with Rick Santorum is something I've always dreamt of. Notice the shirt: "Google Santorum".

Dan continued in the same vein, adding, “I’d be up for whipping up some Santorum in Santorum.” The crowd went wild for that one too. For those of you who don’t keep abreast of LGBTQXYZ slang, urbandictionary.com defines “Santorum” as follows:
“The sometimes frothy, usually slimy amalgam of lubricant, stray fecal matter, and ejaculate that leaks out of the receiving partner’s anus after a session of anal intercourse. Named, by popular demand and usage, by legislator Rick Santorum because of his homophobic political statements.”
Apparently, the inventor of that handy phrase was none other than…Dan Savage! Yes, Dan Savage invented the term for the substance I always find in my underwear after my husband (or someone else) sodomizes me. And to think that some people think that butt sex is gross. What’s gross about spooge, fecal matter and KY-Jelly? Savage calls it Santorum, which is pretty funny because we know that the name would bother the actual guy named Santorum. And that’s what we like to.
Dan Savage is always prepared to offer his own brand of incisive social commentary. Some of you may remember his recent throwing of the gauntlet to John Cummins of the British Columbia Conservative Party. After Cummins said that homosexuality is a “conscious choice”–but before he was dragged off to one of those Stalinist “hate speech” show trials they’re so fond of in Canada–Dan Savage offered him what he called the “Choicer Challenge”.
“What if being gay is something people consciously choose? Gee, if only there were a way for choicers to prove that they’re right and everyone else is wrong… actually, there is way for choicers to prove that they’re right! I hereby publicly invite—I publicly challenge—John Cummins to prove that being gay is a choice by choosing it himself.  Suck my dick, John. I’m completely serious about this, John. You’re not my type—you’re about as far from my type as a human being without a vagina gets—but I have just as much interest as you do in seeing this gay-is-a-choice argument resolved once and for all. You name the time and the place, John, and I’ll show up with my dick and a camera crew. Then you can show the world how it’s done. You can demonstrate how this “conscious choice” is made. You can flip the switch, John, make the choice, then sink to your bony old knees and suck my dick. And after you’ve swallowed my load, John, we’ll upload the video to the internet and you’ll be a hero to other choicers everywhere.”

Boo-yah! Score one for Savage! He offered the bigoted Canadian MP the opportunity to suck his dick, and because Cummins chose not to, that means that there’s no “choice” involved. Other than the choice Cummins exercised not to smoke Dan Savage’s pole. But that only proves my point.

Personally, I think Dan Savage was just trying to get a free blowjob out of the deal. All you have to do is ask, Dan! Leave me a comment. No need to go propositioning bigoted politicians north of the border.

You may also remember Dan Savage as “the doorknob licker”. No, that’s not some kind of new-fangled homophobic slur. He actually licks doorknobs. And staplers, and telephones. He brags of it, in fact. In 2000, Dan Savage visited Gary Bauer’s Presidential HQ in Iowa, where he snuck into the office and started licking objects in an attempt to spread his flu virus to staffers, and hopefully, to the candidate himself. Bauer is an ultra-right wing evangelical Christofascist loser. Just keep that in mind as you read Savage’s account of his germ warfare campaign:

I go around the room licking doorknobs. They are filthy, no doubt, but there isn’t time to find a rag to spit on. If for some reason I don’t manage to get a pen from my mouth to Gary’s hands at the conference, I want to seed his office with germs, get as many of his people sick as I can, and hopefully one of them will infect the candidate. I lick office doorknobs, bathroom doorknobs. When that’s done, I start on the staplers, phones, and computer keyboards. Then I stand in the kitchen and lick the rims of all the clean coffee cups drying in the rack. I grab my coat and head out.

It must have taken real courage to lick all of those “filthy” things. Icky. Well, I personally have no qualms with filth or with licking filthy things. I’ve never met a gay man who did. I kind of thought that it was a prerequisite for being a gay man that you actually liked filth and licking stuff. Anyway, read the whole thing here:

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Content?oid=3092

Well known Christofascist Gary Bauer. I hope he caught the flu from Dan Savage. Or any other communicable disease that Dan Savage has. Which is probably a pretty long list. I think right-wing bigots like Bauer deserve viruses.

When Dan acts this way, he’s just being true to himself. He was born this way. If you think he’s a real sick individual, maybe you’re just a prude. Keep up the good, work Dan! And Bill, and Marc. You’re doing great work. Remember, hate-fucking Republicans is funny.

Advertisements

Comments on: "Who’s up for hate-fucking some Republicans?" (11)

  1. dan savage = genius! thanks for sharing

  2. grouprint said:

    Since you’re gay, I would think you would be more offended by sexist comments and rape fantasies.

    http://grouprint.wordpress.com/2011/07/16/bill-maher-program-calls-for-michele-bachmann-to-be-fd-angrily/#comments

  3. You *know* I’m all in. This is war, and I will be here every day, relentlessly shining a light on the the truth about the Republican Party and Evil Christian Domionists, both of which have devolved into nothing but Right-Wing Terrorist Organizations that target you, me and all peaceful Americans who want nothing more than to live in a tolerant society that values clean air, clean water, a solid education for our children, and hope that there will come a day when America again leads the world.

    There is only one objective: The utter destruction of this Republican Party.

    Reason & Intelligence will prevail over Hatred & Ignorance. Case in point: the ‘We Respect Marriage Act’ aka DOMA Repeal that has been introduced in the Senate by Leahy (D-VT) and Coons (D-DE). Mr. Coons won Joe Biden’s Senate seat, which would surely have gone to Republican Mike Castle were it not for the Teahadists and Christine “I am not a Witch” O’Donnell.

    Become a Citizen Co-Sponsor of the ‘We Respect Marriage Act’ at:
    http://www.werespectmarriage.com/

    Visit me at: http://namelessgenxer.wordpress.com/

    • Fantastic organization. I like your militarism.

      When you’re dealing with conservatives, it’s important to use as a starting point the idea that their very disagreement represents “right-wing terrorism”. And because they are terrorists–every last one of them–we should declare war on them. We can call it…a war on terror? Wait, I think Bush already tried that.

      But Bush’s war on terror was against actual terrorist organizations like the one that carried out the 9/11 attacks. Basically, he was picking on Muslims. We couldn’t wait to surrender fast enough. That wasn’t a war on terror we felt like fighting.

      Our war on terror will be something else entirely. Instead of uniting with conservative Americans against Islamic crazies, we’d rather unite with Islamic crazies against conservative Americans.
      We will harrass everyone with a different idea, and usher in the “utter destruction of the Republican Party”. Then we can have one party rule, which is what we always wanted. No one will be able to stand in our way.

      I’m glad that we can agree on the idea that there is no “live and let live” with fascists like these. War is the only answer. We must treat conservative Christians like animals. And, like all wars–violence is necessary.

  4. I am continually astounded and disappointed at how many people keep falling for this obvious “satire”. Do you all really have your heads that far up your rear ends? This guy is not gay. He’s trying to parody the gay press, and he’s doing it in the most vile way he possibly can. Seriously people, wtf?

  5. It’s so cute when a republican tries Satire… most of the time they just end up making themselves look like the prude sex deprived douche bags they really are but in a funnier way! But even in their Satirical jests you will find the misinfomartion seeping through thair cool outer veneer.

    1) Angry sex = rape fantasy? Really??? Reeeaaaally? This author must be seriously fucked up if he can’t differentiate between the two.. that or he knows absolutely nothing about women or sex in general. I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt and go with the latter.. because in order to be /that/ repressed you either have to be psychotic or EXTREMELY bad in bed.

    2) Bush’s war on terrorism was /actually/ on terrorists..

    …….
    ………………

    I thought it was about Nuclear weapons… that were never found… in Iraq.. not you know.. where Bin Laden was ACTUALLY hiding as was discovered by OBAMA and not Bush… you know except for that. And for all the boys and girls who missed that little umm FACT it was not Iraq.. it was Pakistan… Ahem!

    3) The little rant about hating people for opposing views.. yeah okay so Liberals and Democrats generally like to disagree loudly with the verbal diarrhea that graces the tongues of many republicans in this fair nation.. but generally if you ask one of us it’s not because we oppose they views, it’s because most of what they spout as fact is actually baseless made up garbage.. and when they try to pass that off as something /real/ and pass legislation based on it , it tends to piss us off quite a bit. Seriously.. you would be the first person to write a whole entire Satirical piece on it if a Liberal did it.. hopefully a Liberal doesn’t do it any time soon because I really really don’t ever want to accidentally read anymore of your Satire ever again.

    That is all for now.. and hopefully forever. Good luck with your umm.. yeah just don’t talk anymore please.

    • I don’t know what you’re calling “satire”. I’m completely serious.

      Angry sex surely doesn’t equal rape fantasies. Especially angry sex with people who don’t want to have sex with you.

      And the Iraq War? I’m totally against it.

    • I see that you’re writing from Nova Scotia. Welcome, my Canadian brother!

      They have lots of great censorship in Canada to keep people from opposing our agenda. Speak against us and we will have you arrested! We need protections like that here in the United States. Don’t worry, though–we’re working on it!

      If only we could gang rape our opponents’ civil rights here the way you can there! Then I might not have to kill myself. But I would still talk about it constantly.

  6. Well gosh golly gee! I reckon I surely don’t agree with anything on this page. I just arrived back at the ranch from my 4th service this week and God didn’t say nuthing about dem Publicans being bad. No he surely didn’t. The bible tells us gays are bad! The bible tells us many other things too, but we think stoning adulterers is going a bit too far so we just forget about those verses…hehehehe…But surely we know dem Pubicans are a good bunch people who want to limit the size of govament! Well i guess except in the bedroom or doctors office, but dats where we need em – da bible tells us so!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: